In a landmark decision, the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming has ruled in favor of the State of Wyoming, compelling the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to make a final determination on Wyoming’s petition to delist the Greater Yellowstone grizzly bear population from the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

The legal battle over the fate of the Greater Yellowstone grizzly bear has been ongoing for nearly two decades, with numerous attempts to remove it from the ESA list being met with legal challenges and setbacks. In 2022, Wyoming petitioned the FWS to delist the bear population, arguing that it had recovered sufficiently and no longer met the criteria for protection under the ESA.Despite finding in February 2023 that delisting may be warranted, the FWS failed to issue a final decision within the 12-month statutory deadline. This prompted Wyoming to take legal action, seeking a court order to enforce the ESA’s deadlines and compel the FWS to act.

The central issue in the case was whether Wyoming had legal standing to bring the lawsuit. The FWS argued that the State had not suffered a concrete injury as a result of the agency’s delay and therefore lacked standing to sue. However, the court ultimately sided with Wyoming, finding that the FWS’s failure to meet the statutory deadline had infringed on the State’s sovereign interest in managing wildlife within its borders.

The court’s decision requires the FWS to issue a final determination on Wyoming’s petition within 45 days of the order. This ruling has significant implications for the future of grizzly bear management in the Greater Yellowstone region. If the FWS decides to delist the bear population, management authority will be returned to the states, potentially leading to changes in hunting regulations and conservation strategies.The case has sparked intense debate between conservation groups and state officials.

Conservation groups argue that delisting the grizzly bear would prematurely remove crucial protections for a still-vulnerable species. They express concerns that state management could lead to unsustainable hunting practices and habitat loss, jeopardizing the long-term survival of the Greater Yellowstone grizzly bear population.

Conversely, state officials and hunting advocates contend that the grizzly bear population has made a remarkable recovery and that federal protection is no longer necessary. They emphasize the need for state-level management to address increasing human-wildlife conflicts and provide greater flexibility in adapting conservation strategies to local needs.

The FWS is now faced with the task of carefully evaluating the scientific evidence and weighing the competing interests in reaching a final decision on the grizzly bear’s protected status. This decision will undoubtedly have far-reaching consequences for the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem and the future of grizzly bears in the region.

©️ The Rocky Mountain Dispatch LLC. 2024